Waa maxay browser-ka aad jeceshahay? Ma^(Are) waxaad, fursad kasta, isticmaashaa Google Chrome ? Ma isticmaashaa Chrome 64-bit ama Chrome 32-bit? Haddii aad weli isticmaalayso nooca 32-bit laakiin Windows -kaagu yahay 64-bit, waa inaad sidoo kale tixgelisaa inaad u beddesho Google Chrome -ka 64-bit ah. Ma la yaabtay kan ugu fiican, ama kan ugu dhaqsaha badan, ama kan leh shuruudaha nidaamka yar? Intaas oo dhan ayaan is weydiinnay, markaas waxaan go'aansannay inaan jawaab u helno su'aalahaas. Waxaan wadnay dhowr bartilmaameed, waxaan cabbirnay isticmaalka RAM , waxaan ka baadhnay shabakadda macluumaadka, waxaanan ku soo afjarnay maqaalkan. Haddii aad rabto inaad ogaato waxa ka duwan noocyada 64-bit iyo 32-bit ee Google Chrome , akhri:

Google Chrome 64-bit vs. 32-bit - Waxqabadka bartilmaameedyada

Waxaan ku bilownay tijaabinta labada nooc ee biraawsarkaaga mareegaha Google dhowr qalab oo cabbiraya: ^(Google)HTML5 test , JetStream 1.1 , Peacekeeper , Basemark Web 3.0 , Octane 2.0 , iyo MotionMark 1.0 . Halbeeg kasta marka laga reebo imtixaanka HTML5 waxa la orday saddex jeer, waxaanan diiwaangelinay celceliska dhibcaha. Mashiinka aan u isticmaalnay tijaabinta waa kumbiyuutar dhexdhexaad ah oo leh celcelis ahaan waxqabadka maanta: AMD FX8350 processor oo ku shaqeeya 4.0 GHz , 8GB of DDR3 at 2133MHz, iyo AMD Radeon R9 270X video card oo leh 2GB ee GDDR5xusuusta. Waxaan isticmaalnay Windows 10 Nooca ^{(Windows 10)} Xirfadlaha^{(Professional)} ah ee 1703 oo leh Cusboonaysiinta Hal^{(Creators Update)} -abuurka .

Dhibcaha imtixaanka HTML5^{(HTML5 test)} waa calaamad muujinaysa sida ugu wanagsan ee browserkaagu u taageero heerka HTML5 iyo waxyaabaha la xidhiidha. Sida aad ka arki karto garaafka soo socda, nooca 64-bit ee Google Chrome wuxuu bixiyaa taageero la mid ah heerka HTML5 ee nooca 32-bit. Tani waa in la filayaa maadaama aan isbarbar dhigeyno noocyada kala duwan ee isla browserka.

Halbeegga JetStream 1.1 wuxuu wadaa imtixaannada daahitaanka kaas oo cabbiraya sida degdegga ah ee codsiyada webku u bilaabi karaan oo ay kor ugu qaadi karaan waxqabadka ugu sarreeya, oo ay si habsami leh u socdaan iyada oo aan la joojin. Waxa kale oo ay waddaa tijaabooyinka wax-soo-saarka kuwaas oo cabbiraya waxqabadka ugu sarreeya ee joogtada ah ee codsiyada shabakadda. Natiijooyinka ugu sarreeya waxay ka dhigan yihiin xawaare degdeg ah iyo waxqabad wanaagsan. Sida aad ku arki karto sawirka hoose, natiijadii aan helnay maaha mid ka duwan. Si kastaba ha ahaatee, nooca 64-bit ee Google Chrome ayaa 8% ka dheereeyay nooca 32-bit.

Marka xigta, waxaanu isticmaalnay bartilmaameedka Nabad^{(Peacekeeper benchmark)} -ilaalinta kaas oo ah bar-beegti hore, laakiin wali waa mid khuseeya shabakada maanta. Nabad^{(Peacekeeper)} -ilaaliye wuxuu cabbiraa waxqabadka browserka isagoo tijaabinaya samayntiisa JavaScript^(JavaScript) iyo awoodda uu u leeyahay inuu qabto hawlaha JavaScript ee sida caadiga ah loo isticmaalo . Nooca 64-bit ee Google Chrome ayaa mar labaad noqday guusha, iyadoo farqi u dhexeeya buundooyinka 4%.

Imtixaankii xigay ee aan isticmaalnay wuxuu ahaa Basemark Web 3.0 . Waxay cabbirtaa awoodda lagu samayn karo walxaha 2D iyo 3D oo ay burburiso hawlo badan oo CSS ah markiiba. Waxa kale oo ay sheegaysaa sida ugu wanaagsan ee browserku u taageero CSS3 , HTML5 , Flash iyo Silverlight iyo sida ugu dhakhsaha badan ee browserku u buuxiyo boggaga una soo diro codsiyada. Tijaabadaan, nooca 64-bit ee Google Chrome ayaa mar kale ku guulaystay, iyadoo uu dhex maray ku dhawaad ​​6%.

Octane 2.0 waa halbeeg ay samaysay oo ay ilaalisay Google laftoodu. Halbeeggani waxa uu cabbiraa waxqabadka JavaScript ee biraawsarkaaga, waxana uu wadaa tijaabooyin taxane ah oo daboolaya kiisaska isticmaalka ugu badan ee laga helo shabakadda. Nooca 64-bit ee Google Chrome wuxuu ku guuleystey inuu helo natiijo ka wanaagsan ku dhawaad ​​7% kii la gaaray nooca 32-bit.

Ugu dambeyntii, waxaan sidoo kale wadnay MotionMark^(MotionMark) , oo ah bartilmaameed diiradda saaraya waxqabadka sawirada. Tijaabooyinku waa kuwo muuqaal ahaan qani ah, waxaana loogu talagalay in lagu adkeeyo nidaamka garaafyada halkii JavaScript . Google Chrome 64-bit wuxuu lahaa wax qabad 16% ka wanaagsanaa nooca 32-bit.

Google Chrome 64-bit vs. 32-bit - isticmaalka RAM

Isticmaalka xusuusta RAM^(RAM) ayaa la mid ah muhiim sida JavaScript ama waxqabadka sawirada, gaar ahaan haddii aad isticmaaleyso aalad gaabis ah, oo RAM ka yar celceliska. Si loo arko inta RAM ee xusuusta uu u baahan yahay Google Chrome 's 64-bit iyo 32-bit versions, waxaanu samaynay waxyaabaha soo socda:

• Waxaan isticmaalnay kumbiyuutar dhexdhexaad ah oo leh celcelis ahaan waxqabadkiisu marka loo eego heerarka maanta: AMD FX8350 processor oo ku shaqeeya 4.0 GHz , 8GB ee DDR3 ee 2133MHz, iyo AMD Radeon R9 270X fiidiyoow ah oo leh 2GB ee xusuusta GDDR5 , dhammaan ku shaqeeya Windows 10 nooca Professional 1703 oo leh Cusboonaysiinta^(Update) Hal-abuurayaasha .
• Waxaan ku rakibnay Google Chrome 64-bit ka dibna Google Chrome 32-bit , mid kasta oo iyaga ka mid ah, waxaan furnay tab isku mid ah. Waxaan isku daynay inaan koobiyeyno dhacdo nolosha dhabta ah, sidaas darteed waxaan u furnay tabs mid kasta oo ka mid ah mareegahan: Gmail , Facebook , CNN , YouTube , BoredPanda , iyo Digital Citizen - 2 tabs annaga. 🙂
• Shabakad kasta oo aan furnay, waxa ku jira waanu u rog-rognay intii suurtagal ah. Taasi waxay la macno tahay in Facebook ay ku qasbanaatay in ay ku sii shubto waxa ku jira boggeeda wararka ilaa ay waydo wax ay tusto, oo ay ku joojisay fariin qosol leh oo ah "Waxaad ku yeelan doontaa sheekooyin badan oo ku jira News Feed haddii aad ku darto saaxiibo badan." ^{("You'll have more stories in News Feed if you add more friends.")}Dhinaca YouTube- ka , kaliya kuma aannu shubin, laakiin waxa aanu sidoo kale ku ciyaarnay muuqaal.

Ra'yigeena iyo waxaan rajeyneynaa in kaaga sidoo kale, dhammaan kuwa kor ku xusan ay tahay inay sameeyaan xaalad u dhow sida ugu macquulsan. Si loo hubiyo intee in le'eg xusuusta RAM uu isticmaalo Google Chrome , waxaanu isticmaalnay habka maamulaha Hawsha^{(Task Manager)} . Taasi waa sababta oo ah waxay tusinaysaa macluumaad faahfaahsan oo ku saabsan tab kasta oo laga furay Google Chrome marka loo eego macluumaadka aad ka hesho Maareeyaha Hawsha ee^{(Task Manager)} laga helo Windows.

Markii aan isticmaalnay nooca 64-bit, Google Chrome wuxuu cunay 1.19 GB oo xusuusta RAM ah si uu ugu shubo dhammaan tabsiyada aan kor ku soo xusnay.

Markii aan isticmaalnay nooca 32-bit, Google Chrome wuxuu u baahday kaliya 634 MB ee xusuusta RAM si uu ugu shubo dhammaan tabsiyadaas.

Sida aad arki karto, xaaladaha nolosha dhabta ah, nooca 64-bit ee Google Chrome wuxuu u baahan yahay ku dhawaad ​​laba jeer xusuusta RAM ee looga baahan yahay nooca 32-bit. Nasiib darro, taasi war wanaagsan uma aha dadka isticmaala aaladaha hooseeya, oo aan ku filnayn xusuusta RAM .

Waxyaabaha kale ee ay tahay in laga fiirsado Google Chrome 64-bit vs. 32-bit ee ku saabsan xawaaraha, amniga iyo xasilloonida

Markii Google uu ku dhawaaqay bilaabista^{(Google announced the launch)} nooca 64-bit ee Chrome , 2014, waxay sidoo kale wadaagaan macluumaad ku saabsan waxa isticmaalayaashu ay ka filayaan. Ka sokow waxqabadka xoogaa dhaqsaha badan ee aan ku cabbirnay bartilmaameedyada, waxaa sidoo kale jira faa'iidooyin aan lagu cabbiri karin qalabkan tijaabada ah:

• Xawaaraha la hagaajiyay marka la macaamilayo garaafyada iyo fiidiyoowga^{(Improved speed when dealing with graphics and video)} - nooca 64-bit ee Google Chrome wuxuu wanaajiyaa xawaaraha garaafyada iyo fiidyaha oo ay ku jiraan fiidiyowyada YouTube-ka ee Qeexida Sare^{(High Definition YouTube)} . Tusaale ahaan, codec -ka VP9 ee lagu isticmaalo fiidiyowyada ^(VP9)YouTube-ka ee Qeexida Sare^{(High Definition YouTube)} wuxuu muujinayaa horumar 15% ah oo ku saabsan qaabaynta codaynta. Natiijo ahaan, xawaaruhu waa la wanaajiyey, waxqabadkuna wuxuu kordhiyaa 25%, gaar ahaan sawirada iyo waxyaabaha ku jira multimedia.
• Nabadgelyo ka wanaagsan^{(Better security)} - nooca 64-bit ee Google Chrome wuxuu ka faa'iidaysan karaa sifooyinka cusub ee amniga ee ku jira Windows 8.1 iyo Windows 10 . Tusaale ahaan, waxay ku darsataa taageerada High Entropy ASLR (Cinwaanka Space Layout Randomization ), kaas oo bixiya lakab ilaalin dheeraad ah iyo difaac wanaagsan oo ka hortagga farsamooyinka dhiig-miirashada. ASLR waxay ku salaysan tahay fursada hoose ee uu weeraryahanku qiyaasi karo meelaha meelaha si aan kala sooc lahayn loo dhigay. Amniga^(Security)waxaa la kordhiyaa iyadoo la kordhinayo booska raadinta. Sidaa darteed, kala soocista ciwaanka ciwaanka ayaa aad waxtar u leh marka entropy badan (dhibaato) ay ku jirto kaydka randomka. Tani waxay ka hortagtaa weeraryahanku inuu si kalsooni leh ugu boodo hawl gaar ah oo laga faa'iidaysto oo xusuusta ah. Qaybaha dheeraadka ah waxay ku qasbaan software-ku inuu isticmaalo dhammaan agabka si uu u helo difaaca ugu sarreeya, hagaajinta sifooyinka amniga ee jira.
• Deganaanshiyaha la hagaajiyay^{(Improved stability)} - 64-bit matoorada wax soo saara ayaa ku dhawaad ​​laba laab ka xasiloon matoorada 32-bit, marka la qabanayo macluumaadka shabakada Gaar ahaan, heerka shilka ee habka wax-soo-saarka ayaa ku dhawaad ​​50% ka yar kan nooca 32-bit ee Google Chrome .

Ka dib, dabayaaqadii 2016, Google ayaa daabacday qoraal kale oo blog ah^{(blog post)} kaas oo ay ku shaaciyeen in 64-bit Chrome uu bilaabay adeegsiga tignoolajiyada Microsoft Profile Guided Optimization ( PGO ), kaas oo Chrome ka dhigaya ilaa 15% si dhakhso ah Windows , sida nooca. 53. Si kastaba ha ahaatee, waxaad helaysaa kor u qaadis la mid ah haddii aad isticmaalayso 32-bit, laakiin kaliya in ay version 54 ama ka cusub.

Gunaanad^(Conclusion) - Google Chrome 64-bit waa mid mudan in la isticmaalo

Waa ammaan in la yiraahdo, marka la isticmaalayo nooca 64-bit ee Google Chrome , inta badan isticmaalayaasha ma dareemi doonaan wax farqi ah oo ku saabsan waayo-aragnimadooda internetka. Waxqabadka-xikmad leh, imtixaanadayadu waxay muujiyeen in kala duwanaanshuhu ay jiraan in la helo. Si kastaba ha ahaatee, waxay weli u badan tahay inay aad u yar yihiin in la dareemo isticmaalka maalinlaha ah. Dhanka kale, waxaa sidoo kale jira qodobka isticmaalka xusuusta RAM oo la tixgeliyo. ^(RAM)Sida 64-bit Google Chromewuxuu cunaa qiyaas ahaan laba jeer in ka badan xusuusta nooca 32-bit, waxay noqon kartaa kaniin adag oo lagu liqo dadka isticmaala aaladaha dhamaadka hoose. Si kastaba ha ahaatee, dhamaadka, waxaan aaminsanahay in faa'iidooyinka dheeraadka ah sida xasilloonida iyo ammaanka oo hagaagay ay ka dhigayaan casriyayntan mid qiimo leh. Tani waa run gaar ahaan haddii aad daawato muuqaalo badan oo qeexitaan sare leh ama aad ku ciyaarto biraawsarkaaga shabakada. Haddii aad rabto inaad u beddesho nooca 64-bit ee Google Chrome maanta, tag boggan^(page) oo ka soo dejiso halkaas.

Google Chrome 64-bit: Is it better than the 32-bit version?

What's your favorіte web browser? Are you, by any chancе, using Google Chrome? Do you υse Chrome 64-bit or Chrome 32-bit? If yоu are still using the 32-bit version but your Windows is 64-bit, you should consider switching to the 64-bit Google Chrome as well. Do уou wonder which is best, or thе fastest, or the one with the lesser syѕtem requirements? We asked ourselves all that toо, so we decided to get an answer to theѕe qυestions. We ran several benchmarks, we measured RAM consumption, we sсoured the web for information, and we endеd up with this article. If you want to know what's different between the 64-bit and 32-bit vеrsions of Google Chrome, read on:

Google Chrome 64-bit vs. 32-bit - Performance in benchmarks

We started by testing the two versions of Google's web browser in several benchmarking tools: HTML5 test, JetStream 1.1, Peacekeeper, Basemark Web 3.0, Octane 2.0, and MotionMark 1.0. Each benchmark except the HTML5 test was run three times, and we recorded the average score. The machine we used for testing is a mid-range computer with average performance by today's standards: AMD FX8350 processor running at 4.0 GHz, 8GB of DDR3 at 2133MHz, and an AMD Radeon R9 270X video card with 2GB of GDDR5 memory. We used Windows 10 Professional version 1703 with Creators Update.

The HTML5 test score is an indication of how well your browser supports the HTML5 standard and its related specifications. As you can see from the following graph, the 64-bit version of Google Chrome offers the same level of support for the HTML5 standard as the 32-bit version. This is to be expected since we are comparing different versions of the same browser.

The JetStream 1.1 benchmark runs latency tests which measure how quickly web applications can start and ramp up to peak performance, and run smoothly without interruptions. It also runs throughput tests which measure the sustained peak performance of web applications. The highest results mean faster speed and better performance. As you can see in the screenshot below, the results we got are not that different. However, the 64-bit version of Google Chrome was 8% faster than the 32-bit version.

Next, we used the Peacekeeper benchmark which is an older benchmark, but it is still relevant to the web today. Peacekeeper measures the browser's performance by testing its JavaScript rendering and its ability to handle commonly used JavaScript functions. The 64-bit version of Google Chrome was the winner again, with a difference between scores of 4%.

The next test we used was Basemark Web 3.0. It measures the ability to render objects in 2D and 3D and crunch multiple CSS operations at a time. It also tells how well the browser supports CSS3, HTML5, Flash and Silverlight and how fast the browser loads pages and send requests. In this test, the 64-bit version of Google Chrome was again the winner, with a margin of almost 6%.

Octane 2.0 is a benchmark developed and maintained by Google themselves. This benchmark measures the JavaScript performance of your web browser, and it runs a series of tests which cover the most common use cases found on the web. The 64-bit version of Google Chrome managed to get a result that's better by almost 7% than what the 32-bit version achieved.

Finally, we also ran MotionMark, a benchmark that focuses on graphics performance. The tests it runs are visually rich, and designed to stress the graphics system rather than JavaScript. Google Chrome 64-bit had a performance that was 16% better than its 32-bit version.

Google Chrome 64-bit vs. 32-bit - RAM consumption

RAM memory consumption is just as important as JavaScript or graphics performance, especially if you are using a slower device, with less RAM than average. To see how much RAM memory is needed by Google Chrome's 64-bit and 32-bit versions, we did the following:

• We used a middle-range computer with an average performance by today's standards: AMD FX8350 processor running at 4.0 GHz, 8GB of DDR3 at 2133MHz, and an AMD Radeon R9 270X video card with 2GB of GDDR5 memory, all running on Windows 10 Professional version 1703 with Creators Update.
• We installed Google Chrome 64-bit and then Google Chrome 32-bit, and for each of them, we opened the same tabs. We tried to copy a real-life scenario, so we opened tabs for each of these websites: Gmail, Facebook, CNN, YouTube, BoredPanda, and Digital Citizen - 2 tabs for us. 🙂
• For each website that we opened, we scrolled their contents as much as it was possible. That meant that Facebook had to keep on loading content into its news feed until it had nothing to show anymore, and stopped with a funny message of "You'll have more stories in News Feed if you add more friends." In the case of YouTube, we did not just load it, but we also played a video in it.

In our opinion and we hope that in yours too, all of the above should make for a situation as close to reality as possible. To check how much RAM memory is used by Google Chrome, we used its Task Manager feature. That is because it shows more detailed information about each tab opened in Google Chrome than the information you get in the Task Manager found in Windows.

When we used the 64-bit version, Google Chrome ate a whopping 1.19 GB of RAM memory to load all the tabs we enumerated above.

When we used its 32-bit version, Google Chrome needed only 634 MB of RAM memory to load all those tabs.

As you can see, in real life situations, the 64-bit version of Google Chrome needs almost twice the RAM memory required by the 32-bit version. Unfortunately, that is not good news for people who use low-end devices, with not enough RAM memory.

Other things to consider about Google Chrome 64-bit vs. 32-bit regarding speed, security & stability

When Google announced the launch of the 64-bit version of Chrome, in 2014, they also shared some information about what users should expect from it. Besides the slightly faster performance we have measured in benchmarks, there are also advantages that cannot be measured with such testing tools:

• Improved speed when dealing with graphics and video - the 64-bit version of Google Chrome improves the speed of graphics and video including High Definition YouTube videos. For example, the VP9 codec used in High Definition YouTube videos shows a 15% improvement in decoding performance. As a result, speed is improved, and the performance increases by 25%, especially in graphics and multimedia content.
• Better security - the 64-bit version of Google Chrome can take advantage of the new security features that are included in Windows 8.1 and Windows 10. For example, it adds support for High Entropy ASLR (Address Space Layout Randomization), which provides an extra protection layer and a better defense against exploitation techniques. ASLR is based upon the low chance of an attacker guessing the locations of randomly placed areas. Security is increased by increasing the search space. Thus, address space randomization is more efficient when more entropy (disorder) is present in the random offsets. This prevents an attacker from reliably jumping to a particular exploited function in memory. The extra bits force the software to use all the resources to obtain maximum defense, improving existing security features.
• Improved stability - 64-bit rendering engines are almost twice as stable as the 32-bit engines, when handling web content. In particular, the crash rate for the rendering process is nearly 50% smaller than that of the 32-bit version of Google Chrome.

Later on, in late 2016, Google published another blog post in which they announced that the 64-bit Chrome has started using Microsoft's Profile Guided Optimization (PGO) technology, which makes Chrome up to 15% faster on Windows, as of version 53. However, you get the same boost if you are using the 32-bit, but only in its version 54 or newer.

Conclusion - Google Chrome 64-bit is worth using

It is safe to say that, when using the 64-bit version of Google Chrome, most users will not feel any difference in their web browsing experience. Performance-wise, our tests have shown that the differences are there to be found. However, they are still probably too small to be felt in daily use. On the other hand, there's also the RAM memory consumption factor to consider. As the 64-bit Google Chrome eats roughly twice as much memory as its 32-bit version does, it may be a tough pill to swallow for people who use lower end devices. However, in the end, we believe that the additional benefits such as the improved stability and security make this upgrade worthwhile. This is especially true if you watch lots of high-definition videos or you play games in your web browser. If you want to switch to the 64-bit version of Google Chrome today, go to this page and download it from there.

Related posts

• Chrome 64-bit ama Chrome 32-bit: Soo deji nooca aad rabto, ee Windows 10 ama ka weyn

• Ku saabsan InPrivate iyo qarsoodi. Waa maxay daalacashada gaarka ah? Waa kuwee browserka ugu fiican?

• Geli Chrome iyo daalacashada kale shaashad buuxda (Edge, Firefox, iyo Opera)

• Waa kuwee browserka ka dhigi doona batterigaaga waqti dheer gudaha Windows 10?

• Sida loo dejiyo server wakiil gudaha Chrome, Firefox, Edge, iyo Opera

• Sideen uga dhigayaa qoraalka ka weyn Chrome, Edge, Firefox, iyo Opera?

• Sida bogga internetka loogu dhejiyo barta shaqada ama Start Menu gudaha Windows 10

• 7 siyaabood oo daalacayaashu ay tahay inay horumariyaan baadhista gaarka ah (Incognito, InPrivate, iwm)

• 4 siyaabood oo loo wadaago faylasha iyo galka OneDrive

• Sida loo isticmaalo Xidhiidhka Kombuyuutarka Fog (RDC) si loogu xidho PC Windows ah

• Sida loo helo, loo habeeyo, oo meesha looga saaro kordhinta Microsoft Edge -

• Sida loo aamusiyo tab gudaha Chrome, Firefox, Microsoft Edge, iyo Opera

• Sida loogu suurtogeliyo Java dhammaan daalacashada shabakadda ee waaweyn

• Sida faylalka loogu soo qaado OneDrive ka Windows PC

• Sida loo isticmaalo OneDrive ee Windows 7

• Sida fog looga galo Windows 10 ka Mac

• Sida loo isticmaalo Skype Windows 10 sida Pro

• Sida loo soo dhaweeyo oo loo soo dhaweeyo biraawsarkaaga -

• 9 Sababood oo Mareegta OneDrive u Yahay Mid Cajiib ah

• Su'aalo fudud: Waa maxay cookies iyo maxay qabtaan?